While countries such as Germany, the United States and Britain to boost the economy, puntano sull’efficienza energetica, sulle energie rinnovabili e quindi sulla creazione di nuovi posti di lavoro, i dinosauri della politica italiana propongono ponti inutili in zone sismiche e abusivismi edilizi autorizzati. Il problema è che non si possono più proporre le soluzioni che erano valide (forse) un secolo fa per far fronte ai problemi di oggi.
Mentre migliaia di cittadini italiani e centinaia di associazioni e movimenti sottoscrivono e si uniscono a campagne come quella dello “Stop al consumo di territorio”, con la quale si chiede a gran voce l’indispensabile arresto dell’urbanizzazione e della cementificazione del nostro Paese, l’instancabile governo Berlusconi ha partorito un’altra of his ideas.
to revive the lifeless Italian economy, in fact, our government has seen fit to propose a "special plan for the construction industry with great effect on the house" that consists of a push liberalization of the rules to build, with a substantial increase in space requirements of all existing buildings "in derogation regulations and planning laws." You will be able
20% increase in space requirements of all existing residential buildings and areas covered by the same amount from the buildings to another destination. You will be able to demolish and rebuild, with 30% more, the buildings constructed before 1989. All this notwithstanding the plans and the opinions of the offices: just the certification of a technician.
short, while countries like Germany and the United States link energy efficiency and renewable energy to boost the economy, while Gordon Brown said that "reducing emissions is an economic opportunity that Britain will not miss ", aiming to make the country one of the main centers of global green economy and especially by providing in this way to create 400 000 jobs, the dinosaurs of Italian politics propose useless bridges in seismic zones and allowed illegal construction.
We have long understood that Italy is a Republic (almost) democratic based on speculation, but these proposals would per uscire dalla crisi? Far aggiungere ai pochi che possono farlo in questo momento un pezzo alla loro casa (senza considerare i problemi a livello paesaggistico e/o di convivenza coi vicini che ciò comporterebbe) è un valido modo per rilanciare un’economia nazionale? E c’è davvero così tanta gente che si può permettere una villa da poter ampliare a proprio piacimento?
Invece di creare nuova occupazione ad esempio facendo ristrutturare e coibentare gli edifici, sostituendone magari porte e finestre in modo da renderli più efficienti a livello energetico, si propone di costruire una stanza o un bagno in più! Invece di rilanciare (temporaneamente) l’occupazione del sud sistemando le disastrate southern highways, you want to build yet another white elephant (the bridge across the Straits). Instead of exploiting the often embarrassing national railway lines, it requires the construction of new treatments for high-speed rail in order to get to Bologna from London in an hour instead of an hour and a half.
A political dinosaur, because it still offers the same ridiculous "solutions" to the economic crisis that were proposed one hundred years ago. New buildings, new infrastructure, revitalization of the automotive industry. As if no one had noticed that the machines we have more than enough, that we are totally immersed in roads and concrete and, above all, as if it was not yet clear that the consumer society has failed miserably in its attempt to improve the quality of people's lives. Because this is always consumption.
To exit the notorious crisis, Mr Berlusconi has only a proposal, to consume, or useless goods that are our own territory does not matter, the important thing is to consume. Eat as much as possible and faster and faster!
Hope someone in politics can do is continue to try to stop this madness, maybe by offering a tad more sensible solutions to this economic crisis perhaps more existential, is not very big.
The municipalities are in most cases open to any compromise will allow forfeiture of their resources, the opposition in Italy is now a distant memory, a casino that believes that choice "positive" is not surprising, being the son of one of the largest manufacturers of Country (Caltagirone), but the most intelligent comment is once again one of the league, with Umberto Bossi, which states: "It should be studied well, we did not want the houses to give to non-EU", focusing on the last of the problems that this measure could create and forgetting that a lot of people working on construction sites in the north but it is not only composed of the extracomunitari di cui sopra, che sostituiscono (così come in molti altri ambiti, e spesso sottopagati) tutti quegli italiani che ritengono più prestigioso partecipare ad un reality show che imparare un mestiere.
Non siamo decisamente in buone mani.
Questa politica è morta, ma ancora non lo sa. Queste continue spinte al consumo, di qualunque tipo esso sia, sono inefficaci. È l’economia stessa (lasciando da parte per un attimo l’ambiente ed i suoi limiti fisici) che non accetta più certe soluzioni.
Tutto il mondo si sta rendendo conto che stiamo assistendo alla morte del sistema consumista, così come abbiamo fatto venti anni fa con quello socialista. Sempre più persone hanno capito, or simply intuition that infinite growth (of any type that is) is not possible.
can no longer offer the solutions that were valid (perhaps) a century ago to address the problems of today. Why is it ridiculous to propose to demolish and reconstruct buildings in the absence of imminent war on European soil, making it possible to do so. It's pathetic offer people the consumer end in itself in a time when, above all, money is not there. It is irritating to continue to devastate the richest country in the world of art and one of the most beautiful landscape in the interest of four building speculators. It is alarming to think how long it will take to remedy this kind of choices.
We are all outraged, and rightly so, for the overdose of rapes in which the media have recently submitted. But it would be time to start to be indignant for rape perennial subject to regulation, our country and our region. Maybe forming patrols of citizens who seek to avoid.
0 comments:
Post a Comment